Let’s Talk About
Linguistics
The 4th
Discussion
Syntax
Definition
base on experts :
- Syntax is the branch of grammar which is concerned with the study of words in sentences and of the means by which such relationship are shown, e.g., word order or inflexion. (R.R.K. Hartman F.C. Stork, op cit., pages. 213).
- Syntax is concerned with the discovery of basic sentences types and with the description of the possible substitutions for each element of the basic types. (Mario Pei and Frank Gaynor, op cit., pages. 39)
- Syntax is the study, and rules of the relation of words to one another as expressions of ideas and parts of the structures of sentences; the study and science of sentence construction. (Archilbald A. Hill, op cit., pages 211).
- Syntax : the largest level of structure is the clause, which can be analyzed into what are called clause functions: subject, predicator, object, complement, and adverbial. (Charles F. Meyer. Introduce to Linguistics. Pages 8).
Words as
forming the unity of the sentence have syntax link that consist of :
This is easy to be observed. The
relation is clear in form order of words in a sentence, it is order of words
placing as symbol in form of written on paper.
It’s mean that words of words’ kinds always need from others kinds. The
summary is:
· Noun need verb
· Determiner needs noun
· Adjective needs noun.
This relation has 2 parts :
· Replacement a word with another word
from same kind
·
Replacement
a word in a sentence with a certain word
b. Word and kind of word.
There are 3 approaches for discuss about word :
1.
Semantic
approach
Word is defined “A linguistics unit
that has single meaning”. The complication is how to assure the single meaning.
2.
Phonology
approach
This approach is started from reality
that speech sound from unity of sound that fragmented, even though in speech
sound, definition of word separation isn’t exactly and as easy as writing
language. Word separation is often suggested with watch pause between words. And it’s not general. In certain
languages, it’s called, fixed stress. It is accent that is
sure in certain syllable. In another explanation, in English that words as verb
usually, is not given stressing, but controlled by word stressing before or
after it. It’s called juncture
3.
Word
as a unity are separated and can’t be separated.
This is opinion by Bloomfield who
gave definition of word as a minimum free form or a linguistics unit which doesn’t permit the
insertion of other linguistic material. Word is linguistic material
that difficult to defined accurately. Linguistics isn’t able to provide word
definition as universal. However, it’s not mean that the word has degree of
linguistics and psychology.
a c. Immediate
Constituent Analysis
This analysis
is a basic for syntax. For example, She went
to Pekanbaru, the immediate
constituent is she and went
to Pekanbaru . Went to Pekanbaru has
immediate constituent, went and to Pekanbaru. If it’s
drawn in diagram is :
From example proofs what R.H. Robins said
:
Sentences are not merely strings of
words in an acceptable order and “making sense”; they are structured into
successive components, consisting of groups of words, contiguous and
discontiguous, and of single words. These groups and single words are called constituents, and when they are
considered as part of successive unraveling of a sentence, they are known, it’s
immediate
constituents.
a d.Endosentris
construction and eksosentris construction.
In this
analysis, we see that combination between a word and another word follow
patterned rules. The words are arranged in endosentris
construction and eksosentris
construction. The difference is if the construction is accordant with one
or more constituent, it’s called endosentris
construction. If it’s not accordant, it’s called eksosentris construction.
In English, eksosentris construction as in :
·
Preposition
phrase : e.g. to London, for Him.
· Connective
words which is followed by clause : e.g. when I was young, because I like it.
e.g. : Phrase boys and girls (noun + conjunction +
noun) is coordinative. Because the boys
and girls can be replaced by boys or girls.
While, in
English endosentris construction
consist of 2 parts :
·
Sub-ordinative
·
Coordinative
e.g. : phrase lazy
boys (adjective + noun), this phrase is not accordant with one of
unsure (lazy or boys)
e.
Transformation
analysis
Chomsky’s theory of generative transformational
grammar was the first to force psychologist to reconsider their whole approach
to the study of language behavior and so heralded the psycholinguistic
‘revolution’ (Judith
Green, oc cit., pages 15).
1.
Linguistics’
theory
Chomsky wrote :
In particular it seems
to me impossible to accept the view that linguistic behavior is a matter of
habit, that is slowly acquired by reinforcement, association, and
generalization, or that linguistic concepts can be specified in terms of a
space of elementary, physically, defined criteria attributes. ‘language isn’t a
habit structure’.
2.
Transformations
In English, there are sentences which have same structure
but different meaning. Grammar is able to explain this case.
e.g. :
a.
Jeon
is easy to please.
b.
Jeon
is eager to please.
The way of
syntax, both of the sentences have same outside-structure. The above sentences
can be said :
a.
Jeon
is easy to please
1)
It
is easy to please Jeon.
2)
To
please Jeon is easy.
While (b) if
it’s said like 1) and 2), it’s very wrong.
b.
Jeon
is eager to please
1)
It’s
eager to please Jeon.
2)
To
please Jeon is eager.
3.
Generative
Owen Thomas said :
The English language is made up of an infinite
number of sentences. Every individual sentence, however, is finite in length.
And every sentence is constructed from a relatively limited number of elements.
If be drawn, structure of TG is :

1.
Syntax
theory
Chomsky divides 3 base rules to get grammatical
sentences :
a.
Phrase
structure rules
b.
Transformational
rules
c.
Morphonemic
rules
Where, only the phrase structure rules will be discussed.
The Phrase Structure Rules is a
unit of rule to follow how the sentences are arranged with patterned grammar.
In analyze sentences, TG uses tree
diagram.
Notes :
P = Phrase Structure ; S = Sentences
; SM = Sentence Modifier (e,g. yes, no, certainly, naturally, maybe, obviously,
etc) ; NP = Noun Phrase ; VP = Verb Phrase ; Nuc = Nucleus ; Aux = Auxiliary ;
N = Nominal ; Det = Determiner ; PL = Plural ; MV = Main Verbs ; Intens =
Intensifier ; AP = Adjective Phrase
P3 : Aux + MV (manner) (place) (time)
(reason)
For example :


a.
Gramatical
Categories
1.
Number
This number is grammatical
categories that gives differences about singular,
dual, and plural.
e.g :
· verb as in : the cat runs away ; the cats run away.
Pointer word as in : this cat ; these cats
· term of countable-uncountable nouns.
there are some nouns can’t get a and an. and have no
plural form. e.g. butter, petrol, water, etc.
· noun of multitude. E.g. the cabinet consists of ten members (collective) ; the cabinet have decided to
hold the meeting next week (noun of multitude).
· Noun in plural . e.g. people, cattle,
poultry, etc.
2.
Gender
In English, there are suffixes –ess as in below, but these are lexis,
not gender:
Male
|
Female
|
Host
|
Hostess
|
Jews
|
Jewess
|
prince
|
Princess
|
Master
|
mistress
|
lad
|
Lass
|
negro
|
Negress
|
lion
|
lioness
|
Those are derivative, not grammatical. So that, we can’t analogous as in
: Teacheress, doctoress, kingess, etc. to show the gender, we can also change
with the front of or the final of the words show the gender. As in :
Male
|
Female
|
grandfather
|
Grandmother
|
landlord
|
Landlady
|
Cock-sparrow
|
Hen-sparrow
|
And there is exception for : bridegroom (male) , bridge (female) ; widow
(male) , widower (female) , fox (male) , vixen (female).
3.
Tense
Tense is grammatical verb
categories that is stated with differences of grammatical and depend on
when is done and when is pronounced in a sentence. As morphology in English,
there are only 2 tenses , they are present and past , while perfect and progressive are shown with using of to be and to have. There is no future
tense in English.
There are summary about
of future
tense:
· I shall, you will, they will, we
shall are only
conventional things.
· Shall and will are helping words that have almost same
function as may, can.
· Will is used not only to show future time,
as in :
Ă˜ Willingness : I’ll come
Ă˜ Custom : she’ll sit 4 hours
Ă˜ Possibility : that’ll be Jeon
Ă˜ General truth : Oil will float on
water.
Past Tense
Past tense
not only shows that a activity is done in the past.
· It follows rule of sequence
of tense in indirect sentences. E.g. he said that he went to Bandung
every day.
· Point of impossibility or lack of
possibility, politeness, as in :
Ă˜ Politeness : I wanted to ask you
something
Ă˜ Willingness in impossibility : I wish
you were here
Ă˜ Impossibility : if it rained today, I
would stay at home.
b.
Concord
and government
The other things to show structure of sentences are :
1)
Concord
There are some of terms for this concord,
are : agreement, congruence, and correspondence. This concord can be there in
grammatical categories as in number, case, gender, noun, etc.
concord in English especially appear in
grammatical categories of number between subject and verb.
2)
Government
Government or reaction, or sometimes
is called syntactic regimen is syntax
goods, with this thing form of certain words inflection are fixed by other
words in a construction. So, the word are fixed should have case, mode, or
certain grammatical. In English, this term of government only for pronouns.
Preposition and verb arrange certain form of pronouns’ pattern, depend on
syntax link.
c.
Subject,
predicate, object.
Here is definition of subject / predicate from Nesfield :
“the word or words denoting the person or thing about which something is
said are called subject of the
sentence. The word or words which say something about person or thing denoted
by subject are called the predicate.
While, Quirk said summary :
“the subject
of the sentence has a close general relation to “what is being discussed”, the
“theme” of the sentence, with the normal implication that something new (the
predicate) is being said about a “subject” that has already been introduced in
earlier sentence.
Why material syntax near that material ponology.in Express,???
BalasHapusBut your materil Very Good. Keep spirit dyofica....... Thank youđŸ˜‡
nice question Linda. as i said above, base on R. R. K. Hartman and F.C. Stork by A. Chaedar Alwasilah in his book "Linguistik Suatu Pengantar", that, "syntax is the branch of grammar which is concered with the study of arrangement of "WORDS" in sentences and of the means by which such relationships are shown". and as we well-known, Phonology discusses about word and sounds of words and their means. so that, it's clear that relationship between syntax and phonology is, phonology is a basic of sentences, where sentences are material of syntax.
Hapusi think, it's clear, isn't? thanks' for your question Linda. and keep visiting my blog
Ny.jeon what the role of syntax in sentences??
BalasHapussyntax is a science that discusses about form of a sentence, phrase, and clause. so, if we wanna make good form of them, we should study syntax. it's mean, syntax has role as a science about how to make good sentence, phrase, and clause. thanks'. always visit my blog
HapusKomentar ini telah dihapus oleh administrator blog.
BalasHapusDo some editing on your post, it seems so amateur...
BalasHapusDyo..could you tell me about relation syntax and semantics?
BalasHapusThank you miss Jeon
nice question vira. as simply, semantic discusses about meaning of structured sentences. if in syntax talks about good formula of a sentence and good structure of a sentence, it's not sure the sentence has good meaning. so, the meaning is discussed in semantic. thanks' . always visit my blog
HapusHi Dyo...your blog is very nice.. and thank you for your presentation today...unfortunately, you don't have enough time to explain to us. I hope you can make simple explanation.
BalasHapusthanks mam. as simply, syntax is a science that discusses about how to build good form of sentences, phrases, and clauses. always visit my blog.
HapusDyo.. Could you tell about relation of syntax and phonology ?
BalasHapusin syntax there's phonology approach. phonology can be defined as sounds are arranged and used in base language. this is illustration that show about role of phonology always linked to other branches of linguistics, including syntax. where syntax discusses about how words are arranged to be complete sentences. of course, we have to know about words and speech sounds. and the both of them are discussed in phonology . thanks' for your question. always visit my blog
HapusHi dyo thank you for nice presentation , i enjoy it a lot. But could you make it more simple , so i can understand well.
BalasHapusthanks fella. yes, i've known that. but actually, as simply, syntax is a science that discusses about how to build good form of sentences, phrases, and clauses. always visit my blog.
HapusWhat is different between morphology and syntax ?
BalasHapusa nice question riska. actually, we know that syntax and morphology focus on about words and its parts. however, there is different both of them. morphology discusses about words but it stuck on words and morphemes. while syntax discusses about words, words' relation in a sentence to another sentence, and words exchange in a sentence. thanks. always visit my blog
HapusHi dyo Ny. jeon,thank you for nice presentation , i enjoy it a lot. But could you make it more simple , so i can understand well:)
BalasHapusthanks so much elfrida. always visit my blog
Hapusdyo, please explain me more about Positional relations :)
BalasHapusHii Dyo, could you explain me about noun clause, adjective clause and adverb clause? Thank you :)
BalasHapusTell me more about noun clause!
BalasHapusnoun clause is dependent clause. it can't be told a sentence yet. because it has no exact meaning yet. it can be functioned as a subject or an object. usually, noun clause uses question words . thanks always visit my blog
HapusHi Dyo, can you tell me what is relationship between syntax with phonology? Thanks
BalasHapusokay agnes. we know that in earlier discussion, phonology discusses function of sounds to distinguish or identify certain words. automatically, phonology is also linked to syntax. where syntax also discusses about words, and words' exchange . beside, in phonology also discusses about stressing and juncture. and if we want to speak up with sentences (syntax), we need to know, which one stressing, which one juncture and etc, and all of those are discussed in phonology. so that we know, phonology and syntax are very linked . thanks, always visit my blog.
Hapushi, could u explain me about the relation between syntax with at least one of branch in linguistic? btw, thanks for your info. i got the point, but i think you can make more simple. THANKS
BalasHapuswhat is syntax definition?
BalasHapusa simply question julianti. but i've explained definition of syntax above. maybe, you can re-read anymore. thanks julianti. always visit my blog.
Hapushi dyo, thanks for information that you gave above, so what is relationship between syntax and lexicology?
BalasHapushai dyo, i still confuse with Concord and government, can you make simple example about it?
BalasHapusDyo i hope you can make simple explanation :)
BalasHapus